Call for Papers 2017

Send papers for publication to editor@edupediapublications.com or edupdediapublications@gmail.com Pen2Print® Journals

Mind Mapping: An In-Depth Conceptual Image in an English Language Classroom

DR. ARTURO G. PALAMING
Assistant Professor
Sur University College
Sultanate of Oman
Mind Mapping: An In-Depth Conceptual Image in an English Language Classroom



ABSTRACT

In this paper, it talked about mind mapping as it used in the classroom in teaching the English Language. Mind mapping was a popular teaching strategy nowadays because of its effectiveness on the performance of the students. This strategy used simple and pictures or images to represent the concept or idea of the students which is related to the general idea.

KEYWORDS

Mind mapping, teaching strategy in teaching English Language, mind map, mind guide and concept formation

INTRODUCTION

Mind mapping is a system for helping students order and structure their reasoning through rationally mapping words and ideas and pictures. They are substantially faster to make, and on account of their visual quality significantly less demanding to recall and survey. The contrast between idea maps and mind maps is that a mind outlines just a single fundamental idea, while an idea guide may have a few. An entire mind map guide may have principle point lines transmitting every which way from the inside. Sub-themes and certainties will fan out these. You don't have to stress over the structure created – this will advance all alone. The accompanying recommendations may build the adequacy of mind mapping:
1. Use single words or basic expressions for data. A solitary solid word and significant expressions can clarify a similar importance all the more strongly.
2. Use shading to isolate distinctive thoughts. This isolates thoughts where vital. It additionally helps you to imagine the mind delineate review. Shading additionally demonstrates the association of the subject.
3. Use images and pictures. Where an image or picture implies something to you, utilize it. Pictures can help you to recall data more adequately than words.
4. Use cross-linkages. Data in one a player in the mind guide may identify with another part. Attract lines to demonstrate the cross linkages. This helps you to perceive how one a player in the subject influences another and how they associate.




MIND MAPPING USE IN THE ACTUAL CLASSROOM

Steps:

1. Removed strips and circles from cardboard. Talk about the principle theme, compose on a hover of cardboard and place on the center of the tangle.

2. Every youngster gives a principle thought regarding the theme, and leaves and draws this thought on another hover of cardboard.

3. Every youngster likewise composes a few words about their primary thought on discrete slips of cardboard.

4. As kids complete, the mind guide is collected on the tangle with associations being made with the pieces of cardboard. This can be stapled to the divider.

Steps (Other Steps):

1. Begin in the focal point of the page with the primary thought. Utilize single words or basic expressions for data.

2. The thought works outward every which way delivering a developing and sorted out structure made out of catchphrases and key pictures.

3. Utilize shading to isolate distinctive thoughts, words, images, bolts and delineating gatherings of words. Utilize images and pictures, shapes, circles, and limits to interface data or utilize bolts to show circumstances and end results.

A mind map is a chart used to outwardly compose data. A mind guide is various leveled and shows connections among bits of the entirety. It is regularly made around a solitary idea, drawn as a picture in the focal point of a clear page, to which related portrayals of thoughts, for example, pictures, words and parts of words are included. Significant thoughts are associated specifically with the focal idea, and different thoughts stretch out from those.

Mind maps can be drawn by hand, either as "harsh notes" amid an address, meeting or arranging the session, for instance, or as higher quality pictures when additional time is accessible. Mind maps are thought to be a sort of creepy crawly graph. A comparative idea in the 1970s was "thought sun blasting".

HISTORY OF MIND MAPPING

In spite of the fact that the expression "mind map" was initially promoted by British prominent brain science creator and TV character.  According to Buzan (2000), the utilization of charts that outwardly "outline" utilizing fanning and spiral maps follows back hundreds of years. These pictorial strategies record information and model frameworks, and have a long history in learning, conceptualizing, memory, visual considering, and critical thinking by instructors, designers, analysts, and others.

 

A portion of the soonest cases of such graphical records was produced by Porphyry (2000), a prominent mastermind of the third century as he graphically envisioned the idea classes of Aristotle. Thinker Ramon Llull (1235–1315) likewise utilized such strategies. The semantic system was created in the late 1950s as a hypothesis to comprehend human learning and grew to assist by Allan M. Collins and M. Ross Quillian amid the mid-1960s. Mind maps are comparative in spiral structure to idea maps, created by learning specialists in the 1970s, however, vary in that the previous are disentangled by centering on a solitary focal key idea.

Promotion of the expression "mind delineate" Buzan's particular approach and the presentation of the expression "mind delineate" amid a 1974 BBC TV arrangement he facilitated, called Use Your Head. In this show and buddy book arrangement, Buzan advanced his origination of outspread tree, outlining watchwords in a bright, brilliant, tree-like structure. Buzan says the thought was enlivened by Alfred Korzybski's general semantics as promoted in sci-fi books, for example, those of Robert A. Heinlein and A. E. van Vogt. He contends that while "customary" frameworks compel perusers to sweep left to right and start to finish, perusers really tend to check the whole page in a non-direct mold. Buzan's treatment likewise utilizes then-well-known suppositions about the elements of cerebral sides of the equator with a specific end goal to clarify the asserted expanded viability of mind mapping over different types of note making.

Mind map guidelines

Buzan recommends the accompanying rules for making mind maps:

1.         Start in the middle with a picture of the theme, utilizing no less than 3 hues.

2.         Use pictures, images, codes, and measurements all through your mind outline.

3.         Select watchwords and print utilizing upper or lower case letters.

4.         Each word/picture is best alone and sitting all alone line.

5.         The lines ought to be associated, beginning from the focal picture. The lines wind up noticeably more slender as they emanate out from the middle.

6.         Make the lines an indistinguishable length from the word/picture they bolster.

7.         Use different hues all through the mind outline, visual incitement and furthermore to encode or gathering.

8.         Develop your very own style of mind mapping.

9. Use accentuation and show the relationship in your mind outline.

10.       Keep the mind delineate by utilizing outspread progressive system or frameworks to grasp your branches.

 

 

USES OF MIND MAPPING

Likewise, with other charting apparatuses, mind maps can be utilized to produce, envision, structure, and arrange thoughts, and as a guide to considering and sorting out data, taking care of issues, deciding, and composing.
Mind maps have numerous applications in individual, family, instructive, and business circumstances, including note taking, conceptualizing (wherein thoughts are embedded into the guide radially around the middle hub, without the verifiable prioritization that originates from chain of importance or consecutive courses of action, and wherein gathering and getting sorted out is saved for later stages), compressing, as a memory aide method, or to deal with a confused thought. Mind maps are likewise elevated as an approach to work together in shading pen imagination sessions.
Notwithstanding these immediate utilize cases, information recovered from mind maps can be utilized to improve a few different applications; for example, master look frameworks, web indexes and hunt and label question recommended. To do as such, personality maps can be broke down with great strategies for data recovery to group a mind guide's creator or reports that are connected from inside the mind outline.

DIFFERENCES OF MIND MAPPING FROM OTHER STRATEGIES


Concept Maps – Mind maps differentiate from thought maps in that mind maps focus on only a solitary word or thought, while thought maps interface various words or contemplations. Also, thought maps conventionally have content names on their interfacing lines/arms. Mind maps rely on upon winding pecking requests and tree structures meaning relationship with a central directing thought, however, thought maps rely on upon relationship between thoughts in more extraordinary cases. In any case, either can be a bit of a greater individual learning base system.

Modelling Graphs – There is no thorough set in stone with mind maps, depending on the discretion of mental helper frameworks. An UML outline or a semantic system has organized components displaying connections, with lines interfacing items to show the relationship. This is for the most part done in highly contrasting with a reasonable and concurred iconography. Mind maps fill an alternate need: they help with memory and association. Mind maps are accumulations of words organized by the mental setting of the creator with visual memory helpers, and, using shading, symbols and visual connections, are casual and important to the correct working of the mind delineate.

 

RESEARCHES ABOUT MIND MAPPING


Effectiveness

Cunningham (2005) drove a customer examine in which 80% of the students thought "mind mapping helped them in improving their thoughts and contemplations in science". Distinctive audits in like manner report valuable results utilizing mind maps.


Farrand, Hussain, and Hennessy (2002) found that dreadful little animal diagrams (like thought maps) had confined, however basic, effect on memory audit in school understudies (a 10% development over standard for a 600-word message just) when stood out from favoured survey procedures (a 6% extension over benchmark).

This change was quite recently solid after seven days for those in the framework accumulate and there was a tremendous decrease in motivation stood out from the subjects' favored methodologies for note taking. A meta find out about thought mapping contemplated that thought mapping is more convincing than "scrutinizing content segments, going to locations, and appreciating class talks".

A comparable audit furthermore contemplated that thought mapping is fairly more practical "than other beneficial activities, for instance, creating rundowns and structures". In like manner, they induced that low-limit understudies may benefit more from mind mapping than high-limit students.

Features of Mind Maps

Beel and Langer (2011) led an exhaustive investigation of the substance of mind maps. They dissected 19,379 personality maps from 11,179 clients of the mind mapping applications SciPlore Mind Mapping (now Docear) and MindMeister.

It comes about incorporate that normal clients make just a couple mind maps (mean=2.7), normal personality maps are fairly little (31 hubs) with every hub containing around 3 words (middle). Nonetheless, there were special cases. One client made more than 200 personality maps, the biggest personality outline of more than 50,000 hubs and the biggest hub contained 7500 words.

The review likewise demonstrated that between various personality mapping applications (Docear versus MindMeister) noteworthy contrasts exist identified with how clients make mind maps.

Automatic Creating of Mind Maps

There have been a few endeavors to make mind maps consequently. Brucks and Schommer made personality maps naturally from full-content streams. Rothenberger et al. separated the principle story of content and introduced it as mind guide. What's more, there is a patent about naturally making sub-themes as a top priority maps.

Pen and Paper and the Computer

There are two reviews that break down whether electronic personality mapping or pen based personality mapping is more powerful.

 

Tools

Mind-mapping programming can be utilized to sort out a lot of data, consolidating spatial association, dynamic various leveled organizing and hub collapsing. Programming bundles can expand the idea of mind-mapping by permitting people to guide more than considerations and thoughts with data on their PCs and the Internet, similar to spreadsheets, reports, Internet locales, and pictures. It has been proposed that mind-mapping can enhance learning/think about productivity up to 15% over routine note-taking.
CONCLUSION
In summary, mind mapping is a strategy that can be used in teaching the English Language such as Writing, Listening, Reading, Vocabulary, and Speaking. In this strategy, the students developed a mental image of the word through the use of a picture. The student can easily understand and build their own experience about the word as written and the mental that was drawn by them. The picture that was mentally built up by the students becomes permanent in their mind. Building a mental image about the word also build mental words related to the main idea or the main concept.
REFERENCES
Adler, Mortimer J., The Crisis in Contemporary Education. Macmillan: New York,  1990.

Bauzon,   Prisciliano   T.,   Fundamental  of Mind Mapping. Metro Manila: National Book Store, Inc.,  1994.

Bayles,   Jordan   Q.,  Ethics,  the  Science and  Arts of  Life.   New   York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co., 1987.

Bram,   Boyd   F.,   Philosophical   Foundations of   Education.   New   York: American Book Co.,  1998.

Brameld,   Theodore   E.,   Imperative  for   a  Reconstructed   Philosophy of Education. Macmillan: New York, 1985.

Brubacher,  John  S., Modem  Philosophies of Education.  Manila:  McGraw-Hill International Co.,  1998.

Motor, Celeste 0., Philosophy of Education Concerns, Purpose, Content, and Methods of Education. Manila: Rex Book Store,  1994.

Butler,  John  J.,  Four  Philosophies  and  their  Practice  In  Education and Religion. New York: The Macmillan Co.,  1996.

James,  Keith.  Philosophy of  Education and  the  Curriculum.  New  York: Pergamon Press Ltd.,  1997.

Kandel,  Claude  E.  College  Teaching  - Psychologist's  View.  New  York: Harcourt Brace and Company,  1980.


Kneller,  George F, Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1990.
Share on Google Plus

0 comments:

Post a Comment