Abstract— The social networking
media have a good or bad effect on education and the life of students. The
social networking website like “Facebook”, “Twitter”, “WhatsApp”, “Viber”, “You
tube”, “Myspace” etc. are constantly students from their studies. The principle
center of understudy ought to be instruction yet shockingly today's understudy
are accentuating on such destinations which can be an entire wastage of time.
Informal organizations was just an electronic association between clients
however sadly it has turned into a compulsion for understudies, adolescents and
even adults. This paper presents effect of informal communities on training,
understudies and effect on life of young people, promote it portrays how long
range informal communication sites are sound-related and perilous for youth furthermore,
adolescents.
Index
Terms—Social media, Education, Students, social
networking, impact of social media on education.
1.
INTRODUCTION
Internet
is very important part of the life .It is a great evolution of technology.
Everybody is associated with each other in this immense system created by the
web. Individuals utilize web for web based shopping, training locales, web
based saving money, electronic sends and numerous other reason for sparing
their time. Some of the students using social networking websites for their
education [3]. Most of them including teenagers and young adults use
social networking websites for wasting their time. Social websites like
Facebook, twitter, YouTube and linkdin have a dangerous impact on the life of
the students. In the past, the use
of these websites is very rare
among students but now with the increase of technology, the use of these
websites is very common among students. The marvels of interpersonal
organization is very easy to comprehend, it is an online office which enables
singular client to assemble a profile character and create subjective
affiliations and associations among himself and rundown of different companions
and speak with them at a focal area [1]. The life of people
especially students are largely influenced by what is posted by other peoples
on their profiles. People connected to each other after registration on these
websites and share fake news and information, images and videos. The habits
that students learn are decide more by
what their friends do and less by the teachings.
These websites are invested by the business men because they use these
websites for their business purpose such as email, video conference and
advertisement this is how social
networks are get paid; user can register himself free of cost in social networking
sites like facebook.com, twitter and linkedin.com etc.
[2] In late 1990's casual group imagined
with Web 2.0 presenting components of blogging and posting with the site named
sixdegrees.com (1997) which enables client to make profiles and make companions,
later it thought of new elements in year 2003 another face of informal
organizations linkedin.com and myspace.com but in year 2003 facebook.com and
orkut.com change the aggregate idea of interpersonal organizations in the
historical backdrop of online networking and web sciences, it changes the
meaning of informal communities. After year 2003 informal organizations were
especially progress with new components, by new features the user even can
change the whole front end appearance of the website on his profile which is a
step towards evolution.
1.1 Objectives of Study
1. Determine
the impact of social networking websites on the education of students.
2. To
analyze the positive impact of these websites on the education of students.
3. To
analyze the negative impact of these websites on the education of students.
4. To
determine how many students used these websites for their education and how
many use for another purpose.
2. Data Analysis
The Data collected through questionnaire are analyzed, interpreted and
then presented on the basis of objectives. Simple percentage method was
achieved to arrive at the results and findings of the data analysis which is
graphically shown by Bar chart.

Figure 2.1 shows analyzed result collected through questionnaire from
the students who using face book. We also study the previous year record of the
students who using Facebook, twitter and YouTube and shows the result in graph.
In 2010:50 percent students using face book, 20 percent students using
Twitter and the rest of 60 percent students who using You Tube.
In 2011:60 percent of students who using Facebook, 40 percent students
using Twitter and 70 percent students using YouTube.
In 2012:70 percent students using
Facebook, 60 percent students using twitter and there are 75 percent of
students who used You Tube.
And in the previous year 2015: there are 95 percent of the students who
using Facebook, 90 percent using Twitter and 90 percent used YouTube.

Fig 2.2: Maintaining Privacy for uploading photos/videos
Fig 2.2 shows that the 89% people maintain privacy while uploading their
videos and photos on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.
Only the 11% people who does not maintain privacy while uploading their
photos and videos on these social networking websites.

Fig
2.3: Gadgets used for Surfing Social Networking Sites
Figure 2.3 shows that, 95% people uses Mobile phone for surfing Social
Networking sites, 80% uses PC, 79% uses both Mobile phone and Laptop and only
50% uses Tab surfing Social Networking sites.

Fig
2.4: Teenagers and Adults who use real and Fake Identities
Figure 2.4 shows that 75% Teenagers use real identities and 80% Adults
use Real Identities. 50% Teenagers use Fake Identities and 55% Adults use Fake
Identities.
3.
Impact
on education
Education is very important part in the life of human being. Today young
person demonstrates particularly enthusiasm for utilizing interpersonal
organizations yet lamentably Social Networks influence instruction seriously [5].
Past research has ascertained that over 90% of understudies utilize informal
organizations [9, 15]. Innovation has demonstrated a quick
improvement by creating little specialized gadgets however these little
specialized gadgets can be utilized for getting to informal communities at
whatever time anyplace, these gadgets incorporate pocket PCs, portable PCs,
iPads and even basic cell phones (which bolster web) and so forth Long range
interpersonal communication destinations have constructive and adverse effect
on instruction and life of understudies.
3.1 Positive impact
·
By investing so much energy working with new
advancements, understudies grow greater recognition with PCs and other
electronic gadgets
·
With the expanded concentrate on innovation
in training and business, this will help understudies assemble aptitudes that
will help them for the duration of their lives. Interpersonal interaction shows
understudies aptitudes they'll have to get by in the business world.
·
Being ready to make and keep up associations
with many individuals in numerous ventures is an essential piece of building up
a vocation or building a business.
·
It enables the kids to trade thoughts and
learn new things. The more they cooperate, the more they learn. This will
perpetually bring about them ending up plainly more certain about existence.
·
The straightforwardness and speed with which
clients can transfer pictures, recordings or stories has brought about a more
noteworthy measure of sharing of inventive works. Having the capacity to get
moment criticism from loved ones on their innovative outlets helps understudies
refine and build up their aesthetic capacities and can give genuinely necessary
certainty or help them choose what vocation way they might need to seek after
[8].
·
The long range interpersonal communication
innovations are inherent such a way, to the point that understudies will have
the capacity to pick the gathering, movement or the individual they would need
to take after for day by day refreshes. If understudies somehow happened to
take after an instruction site, or a teacher, or an establishment they might
need to go to for higher reviews, or an innovation they need to keep a tab on;
all these and more should be possible by means of long range informal
communication advances. The methods for learning is bounty.
·
Technology is venture towards improvement,
most likely however any innovation which can give simplicity of informal
communities can be unsafe for interpersonal organization addicts.
3.2 Negative Impact
·
Social Media had become a major distraction to students,
causing the overall performance of students to decline, especially the ones who
tend to check their Facebook and twitter while studying.
·
Students have begun depending more on the
data open effortlessly on these long range interpersonal communication locales
and the web. This lessens their learning and research abilities [19].
·
Students who get incorporated into activities
by means of online systems administration media regions while looking at bring
about decreasing in their convergence of thought. This causes decrease in their
scholarly execution, and fixation to study well. Their capacity to focus on the
errand is essentially lessened by the diversions that are achieved by YouTube,
unearth, Facebook or Twitter.
·
Students are having a harder time getting the
chance to convey up close and personal with individuals. The additional time
the understudies spend on these online networking locales, the less time they
will go through associating face to face with others. This diminishes their relational
abilities, and are losing their relationship building abilities, because of
that they are investing increasingly energy talking from behind a screen[20].
·
Students, while seeking and concentrate
online get pulled in to utilizing web-based social networking destinations and
at some point they overlook why they are utilizing web. This squanders their
time and now and again understudies are not ready to convey their work in the
predetermined time period.
·
The understudy's motivational level decreases
because of the utilization of these long range informal communication
destinations. They depend on the virtual condition as opposed to increasing
functional learning from this present reality.
·
Students for the most part utilize slang
words or abbreviated types of words on long range interpersonal communication
destinations. They begin depending on the PC syntax and spelling check
highlights. This decreases their charge over the dialect and their exploratory
writing abilities.
·
The over the top utilization of these
destinations influence the mental and additionally physical wellbeing.
Understudies don't take as much time as is needed and take appropriate rest.
They take unnecessary measure of espresso or tea to stay dynamic and
concentrated which impacts adversely on their wellbeing [10].
4. Suggestions
1. Negative impacts of
social media on education can be overcome by reducing the amount of time spent
on social network sites.
2.
Paying regard for their scholarly
advance and tending to any issues will go far towards keeping the negative
parts of web-based social networking from affecting their reviews.
3.
Parents should also be suggested to spent
more time to their rooms in leisure time in a frank way and try to understand
their problems as far as possible in order that their child might not get much
be addicted towards bad social networking
sites.
5. Conclusion
These networking
websites ruin the future of the students. Students spent more time on these
websites rather than with their families. They considered that their friends
and virtual relation are their well-wisher and they think that their blood
relation are fake. That’s why they like to chat with friends and share their
inner feelings with their friends rather than their parents and family. It is
also a strong recommendation for Govt. and international cyber jurisdiction to
take part and ban these types of websites, other than government and
jurisdiction, every parent should strictly ban use of social networks on their
children and secure their future.
6. References
[1] IJCSI International Journal of Computer
Science Issues, “introduction of social media/social network on life of students” Vol. 9, Issue 4,
No 3, July 2012
[2] Danah M. Boyd & Nicole B.
Ellison, “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship”, In
Journal Of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, Issue 1, October 2007.
[3] J. Cain, “Online Social Networking Issues Within Academia and Pharmacy
Education" In American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 72,
Article 10, February 2008.
[4] N. Ellison, C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe, “The benefits of Facebook
“friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network
sites”, In Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, Issue 4, 2007.
[5] C. Wiley, & M. Sisson, “Ethics, accuracy and assumption: The use of
Facebook by students and employers”, Presented at the Southwestern Ohio Council
for Higher Education Special Topics Forum, Dayton, OH. November 2006.
[6] S. Kuppuswamy, P. B. Shankar Narayan, “The Impact of Social Networking
Websites on the Education of Youth”, In International Journal of Virtual Communities
and Social Networking, Vol. 2, Issue 1, page 67-79, January-March 2010.
[7] Tiffany A. Pempek, Yevdokiya A. Yermolayeva, Sandra L. Calvert, “College
students’ social networking experiences on Facebook”, In Journal of Applied
Developmental Psychology, Vol. 30, Issue 3, page 227–238, 2009.
[8] Deborah Davis and Sarah Stewart (2016). Social Media and Networking:
Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1027-1052)
[9] Alexiei Dingli (2012). International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social
Networking (pp. 18-29).
[10] Abdullah Saykili and Evrim Genç Kumtepe (2016). Social Media and
Networking: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 684-709).
[11] Kuppuswamy, Sunitha.&Shankar Narayan,P.B.(2001).The Impact of Social
Networking Websites on The Education of Youth. Retrieved 25 september, 2014,
[12]Sei-Chi Jonna Sin &Khung-Sun- Kim(2014).Impact of Social Media Usage
on the outcomes of Students’ Everyday life Information Seeking .Retrieved 2nd
November,2014,
[13] Khan, Shazad. Impact of Social Networking Websites on Students
Life. Retrieved 2nd November, 2014, from 64.17.184.140/wp-content/. . ./
v512-5pdf.
[14] Qingya Wanget.al. (2011) .The effect Social Media on College Students.
Retrieved 20th November, 2014, from Scholar sarchive.jwu.edu/. .
./view.content.c…
[15] Tayseer, Mohamed.et.al. (2014). Social Network: Academic & Social
Impact on College Students. Retrieved 20th November, 2014, from, asee-ne.org/.
. ./students/20 papers/125.pdf.
[16] Velenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K.F. (2008). Lessons from
Facebook: The Effect of Social Network Sites on College Students’ Social.
Retrieved from
[17] Y. (2011). The Effects of Social Media on College Students. Johnson
& Wales University. Retrieved from
[18] K. Williams, A. Boyd, S. Densten, R. Chin, D. Diamond, and
C. Morgenthaler, “Social Networking Privacy Behaviors and Risks”, In Proceeding
of CSIS Research Day, Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University, USA. 2009.
[19] M. Trusov, R. E. Bucklin, &
K. Pauwels, “Effects of Wordof-Mouth Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings
from an Internet Social Networking Site”, In Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73,
Issue 5, page 90-102, September 2009.
[20] Schill, R. (2011). Social
Networking Teens More Likely to Drink, Use Drugs, Study Finds.Abstract— The social networking
media have a good or bad effect on education and the life of students. The
social networking website like “Facebook”, “Twitter”, “WhatsApp”, “Viber”, “You
tube”, “Myspace” etc. are constantly students from their studies. The principle
center of understudy ought to be instruction yet shockingly today's understudy
are accentuating on such destinations which can be an entire wastage of time.
Informal organizations was just an electronic association between clients
however sadly it has turned into a compulsion for understudies, adolescents and
even adults. This paper presents effect of informal communities on training,
understudies and effect on life of young people, promote it portrays how long
range informal communication sites are sound-related and perilous for youth furthermore,
adolescents.
Index
Terms—Social media, Education, Students, social
networking, impact of social media on education.
1.
INTRODUCTION
Internet
is very important part of the life .It is a great evolution of technology.
Everybody is associated with each other in this immense system created by the
web. Individuals utilize web for web based shopping, training locales, web
based saving money, electronic sends and numerous other reason for sparing
their time. Some of the students using social networking websites for their
education [3]. Most of them including teenagers and young adults use
social networking websites for wasting their time. Social websites like
Facebook, twitter, YouTube and linkdin have a dangerous impact on the life of
the students. In the past, the use
of these websites is very rare
among students but now with the increase of technology, the use of these
websites is very common among students. The marvels of interpersonal
organization is very easy to comprehend, it is an online office which enables
singular client to assemble a profile character and create subjective
affiliations and associations among himself and rundown of different companions
and speak with them at a focal area [1]. The life of people
especially students are largely influenced by what is posted by other peoples
on their profiles. People connected to each other after registration on these
websites and share fake news and information, images and videos. The habits
that students learn are decide more by
what their friends do and less by the teachings.
These websites are invested by the business men because they use these
websites for their business purpose such as email, video conference and
advertisement this is how social
networks are get paid; user can register himself free of cost in social networking
sites like facebook.com, twitter and linkedin.com etc.
[2] In late 1990's casual group imagined
with Web 2.0 presenting components of blogging and posting with the site named
sixdegrees.com (1997) which enables client to make profiles and make companions,
later it thought of new elements in year 2003 another face of informal
organizations linkedin.com and myspace.com but in year 2003 facebook.com and
orkut.com change the aggregate idea of interpersonal organizations in the
historical backdrop of online networking and web sciences, it changes the
meaning of informal communities. After year 2003 informal organizations were
especially progress with new components, by new features the user even can
change the whole front end appearance of the website on his profile which is a
step towards evolution.
1.1 Objectives of Study
1. Determine
the impact of social networking websites on the education of students.
2. To
analyze the positive impact of these websites on the education of students.
3. To
analyze the negative impact of these websites on the education of students.
4. To
determine how many students used these websites for their education and how
many use for another purpose.
2. Data Analysis
The Data collected through questionnaire are analyzed, interpreted and
then presented on the basis of objectives. Simple percentage method was
achieved to arrive at the results and findings of the data analysis which is
graphically shown by Bar chart.

Figure 2.1 shows analyzed result collected through questionnaire from
the students who using face book. We also study the previous year record of the
students who using Facebook, twitter and YouTube and shows the result in graph.
In 2010:50 percent students using face book, 20 percent students using
Twitter and the rest of 60 percent students who using You Tube.
In 2011:60 percent of students who using Facebook, 40 percent students
using Twitter and 70 percent students using YouTube.
In 2012:70 percent students using
Facebook, 60 percent students using twitter and there are 75 percent of
students who used You Tube.
And in the previous year 2015: there are 95 percent of the students who
using Facebook, 90 percent using Twitter and 90 percent used YouTube.

Fig 2.2: Maintaining Privacy for uploading photos/videos
Fig 2.2 shows that the 89% people maintain privacy while uploading their
videos and photos on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.
Only the 11% people who does not maintain privacy while uploading their
photos and videos on these social networking websites.

Fig
2.3: Gadgets used for Surfing Social Networking Sites
Figure 2.3 shows that, 95% people uses Mobile phone for surfing Social
Networking sites, 80% uses PC, 79% uses both Mobile phone and Laptop and only
50% uses Tab surfing Social Networking sites.

Fig
2.4: Teenagers and Adults who use real and Fake Identities
Figure 2.4 shows that 75% Teenagers use real identities and 80% Adults
use Real Identities. 50% Teenagers use Fake Identities and 55% Adults use Fake
Identities.
3.
Impact
on education
Education is very important part in the life of human being. Today young
person demonstrates particularly enthusiasm for utilizing interpersonal
organizations yet lamentably Social Networks influence instruction seriously [5].
Past research has ascertained that over 90% of understudies utilize informal
organizations [9, 15]. Innovation has demonstrated a quick
improvement by creating little specialized gadgets however these little
specialized gadgets can be utilized for getting to informal communities at
whatever time anyplace, these gadgets incorporate pocket PCs, portable PCs,
iPads and even basic cell phones (which bolster web) and so forth Long range
interpersonal communication destinations have constructive and adverse effect
on instruction and life of understudies.
3.1 Positive impact
·
By investing so much energy working with new
advancements, understudies grow greater recognition with PCs and other
electronic gadgets
·
With the expanded concentrate on innovation
in training and business, this will help understudies assemble aptitudes that
will help them for the duration of their lives. Interpersonal interaction shows
understudies aptitudes they'll have to get by in the business world.
·
Being ready to make and keep up associations
with many individuals in numerous ventures is an essential piece of building up
a vocation or building a business.
·
It enables the kids to trade thoughts and
learn new things. The more they cooperate, the more they learn. This will
perpetually bring about them ending up plainly more certain about existence.
·
The straightforwardness and speed with which
clients can transfer pictures, recordings or stories has brought about a more
noteworthy measure of sharing of inventive works. Having the capacity to get
moment criticism from loved ones on their innovative outlets helps understudies
refine and build up their aesthetic capacities and can give genuinely necessary
certainty or help them choose what vocation way they might need to seek after
[8].
·
The long range interpersonal communication
innovations are inherent such a way, to the point that understudies will have
the capacity to pick the gathering, movement or the individual they would need
to take after for day by day refreshes. If understudies somehow happened to
take after an instruction site, or a teacher, or an establishment they might
need to go to for higher reviews, or an innovation they need to keep a tab on;
all these and more should be possible by means of long range informal
communication advances. The methods for learning is bounty.
·
Technology is venture towards improvement,
most likely however any innovation which can give simplicity of informal
communities can be unsafe for interpersonal organization addicts.
3.2 Negative Impact
·
Social Media had become a major distraction to students,
causing the overall performance of students to decline, especially the ones who
tend to check their Facebook and twitter while studying.
·
Students have begun depending more on the
data open effortlessly on these long range interpersonal communication locales
and the web. This lessens their learning and research abilities [19].
·
Students who get incorporated into activities
by means of online systems administration media regions while looking at bring
about decreasing in their convergence of thought. This causes decrease in their
scholarly execution, and fixation to study well. Their capacity to focus on the
errand is essentially lessened by the diversions that are achieved by YouTube,
unearth, Facebook or Twitter.
·
Students are having a harder time getting the
chance to convey up close and personal with individuals. The additional time
the understudies spend on these online networking locales, the less time they
will go through associating face to face with others. This diminishes their relational
abilities, and are losing their relationship building abilities, because of
that they are investing increasingly energy talking from behind a screen[20].
·
Students, while seeking and concentrate
online get pulled in to utilizing web-based social networking destinations and
at some point they overlook why they are utilizing web. This squanders their
time and now and again understudies are not ready to convey their work in the
predetermined time period.
·
The understudy's motivational level decreases
because of the utilization of these long range informal communication
destinations. They depend on the virtual condition as opposed to increasing
functional learning from this present reality.
·
Students for the most part utilize slang
words or abbreviated types of words on long range interpersonal communication
destinations. They begin depending on the PC syntax and spelling check
highlights. This decreases their charge over the dialect and their exploratory
writing abilities.
·
The over the top utilization of these
destinations influence the mental and additionally physical wellbeing.
Understudies don't take as much time as is needed and take appropriate rest.
They take unnecessary measure of espresso or tea to stay dynamic and
concentrated which impacts adversely on their wellbeing [10].
4. Suggestions
1. Negative impacts of
social media on education can be overcome by reducing the amount of time spent
on social network sites.
2.
Paying regard for their scholarly
advance and tending to any issues will go far towards keeping the negative
parts of web-based social networking from affecting their reviews.
3.
Parents should also be suggested to spent
more time to their rooms in leisure time in a frank way and try to understand
their problems as far as possible in order that their child might not get much
be addicted towards bad social networking
sites.
5. Conclusion
These networking
websites ruin the future of the students. Students spent more time on these
websites rather than with their families. They considered that their friends
and virtual relation are their well-wisher and they think that their blood
relation are fake. That’s why they like to chat with friends and share their
inner feelings with their friends rather than their parents and family. It is
also a strong recommendation for Govt. and international cyber jurisdiction to
take part and ban these types of websites, other than government and
jurisdiction, every parent should strictly ban use of social networks on their
children and secure their future.
6. References
[1] IJCSI International Journal of Computer
Science Issues, “introduction of social media/social network on life of students” Vol. 9, Issue 4,
No 3, July 2012
[2] Danah M. Boyd & Nicole B.
Ellison, “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship”, In
Journal Of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, Issue 1, October 2007.
[3] J. Cain, “Online Social Networking Issues Within Academia and Pharmacy
Education" In American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 72,
Article 10, February 2008.
[4] N. Ellison, C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe, “The benefits of Facebook
“friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network
sites”, In Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, Issue 4, 2007.
[5] C. Wiley, & M. Sisson, “Ethics, accuracy and assumption: The use of
Facebook by students and employers”, Presented at the Southwestern Ohio Council
for Higher Education Special Topics Forum, Dayton, OH. November 2006.
[6] S. Kuppuswamy, P. B. Shankar Narayan, “The Impact of Social Networking
Websites on the Education of Youth”, In International Journal of Virtual Communities
and Social Networking, Vol. 2, Issue 1, page 67-79, January-March 2010.
[7] Tiffany A. Pempek, Yevdokiya A. Yermolayeva, Sandra L. Calvert, “College
students’ social networking experiences on Facebook”, In Journal of Applied
Developmental Psychology, Vol. 30, Issue 3, page 227–238, 2009.
[8] Deborah Davis and Sarah Stewart (2016). Social Media and Networking:
Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1027-1052)
[9] Alexiei Dingli (2012). International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social
Networking (pp. 18-29).
[10] Abdullah Saykili and Evrim Genç Kumtepe (2016). Social Media and
Networking: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 684-709).
[11] Kuppuswamy, Sunitha.&Shankar Narayan,P.B.(2001).The Impact of Social
Networking Websites on The Education of Youth. Retrieved 25 september, 2014,
[12]Sei-Chi Jonna Sin &Khung-Sun- Kim(2014).Impact of Social Media Usage
on the outcomes of Students’ Everyday life Information Seeking .Retrieved 2nd
November,2014,
[13] Khan, Shazad. Impact of Social Networking Websites on Students
Life. Retrieved 2nd November, 2014, from 64.17.184.140/wp-content/. . ./
v512-5pdf.
[14] Qingya Wanget.al. (2011) .The effect Social Media on College Students.
Retrieved 20th November, 2014, from Scholar sarchive.jwu.edu/. .
./view.content.c…
[15] Tayseer, Mohamed.et.al. (2014). Social Network: Academic & Social
Impact on College Students. Retrieved 20th November, 2014, from, asee-ne.org/.
. ./students/20 papers/125.pdf.
[16] Velenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K.F. (2008). Lessons from
Facebook: The Effect of Social Network Sites on College Students’ Social.
Retrieved from
[17] Y. (2011). The Effects of Social Media on College Students. Johnson
& Wales University. Retrieved from
[18] K. Williams, A. Boyd, S. Densten, R. Chin, D. Diamond, and
C. Morgenthaler, “Social Networking Privacy Behaviors and Risks”, In Proceeding
of CSIS Research Day, Seidenberg School of CSIS, Pace University, USA. 2009.
[19] M. Trusov, R. E. Bucklin, &
K. Pauwels, “Effects of Wordof-Mouth Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings
from an Internet Social Networking Site”, In Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73,
Issue 5, page 90-102, September 2009.
[20] Schill, R. (2011). Social
Networking Teens More Likely to Drink, Use Drugs, Study Finds.