Priyanka
Garg1, Yogesh Verma2
[1]
Priyanka Garg, Assistant Professor, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Ambala.
[1]
Yogesh Verma, Research Scholar, Central University of Rajasthan
ABSTRACT
Used by millions of people worldwide, social
networking sites have altered human behaviour on the web, resulting in reduced
personal inhibitions of sharing information online. The most popular social
media include blogs, wikis, photo-sharing sites, Internet forums and extend to
social networking utilities like personal blogs, Ning, Twitter, Bebo, MySpace and Facebook. There
are three basic types of social networking websites: ‘free-for-all’ social
websites, including Facebook, MySpace, and Friendster; professional websites,
including LinkedIn, FastPitch, and Plaxo; and industry-specific websites like
I-Meet.
Social
networking site, Facebook, gained over 100 million users in the United States
from 2009 to 2010: a 145% growth rate within a year (McCorvey, 2010). Also, some
corporations are increasingly experimenting with the use of social networks to
improve business operations (Schwarz, 2008). It should be noted that the use of
social media doubled from 11% to 22% between 2008 and 2009 (Sarrel, 2010). Usage
and importance of Social Networking Sites are increasing day by day.
The present study has made an attempt to study the extent
of usage and importance given to the social networking sites by the students of
different departments of Panjab University. Various on-campus students were invited to
take part in the survey. Final sample constitutes students from all the departments
of Panjab University. Analysis has been done using SPSS 16. Further, analysis
of data has been presented in the forms of charts as well. Results of the study
revealed that majority of respondents
are aware of SNS. More than 50 percent of the respondents use SNS more than
once a day.
Key Words: Social networking sites, Online behavior, Social
networks
1.
INTRODUCTION
Social Networking Sites (SNS)
provides a platform for social, emotional, and cognitive development of youth
(Roberts et al., 2005). SNS have infiltrated people’s daily life with amazing
rapidity to become an important social platform for computer-mediated
communication (Tapscott, 2008; Correa et al., 2010). SNS is a cyber environment
that allows the individual to construct his/her profile, sharing text, images,
and photos, and to link other members of the site by applications and groups
provided on the Internet (Boyd and Ellison, 2008; Tapscott, 2008; Pfeil et al.,
2009; Powell, 2009). Generations today are experiencing a new wave of
interpersonal communication as “the use of social networking tools and
practices has considerable impact on scholarly communication at colleges and universities”
(Penzhorn, 2009). These SNSs are helping students evolve with the current trends
in technology and the changing face of the world of communication.
SNSs are profile-based websites that allow users to
maintain social relationships by viewing, visiting, and sharing their lists of
social connections with other members (Boyd and Ellison, 2007). SNS allow their
users to create a personal profile that displays information about the user and
articulate a network of ‘‘friends’’ or others users between whom profile
information is shared. These sites provide multiple services to its users. Users
begin by creating a personal profile, which generally includes information about
their education and work experience, birth date, location and contact
information, hobbies, personal interests.
Social Network Sites have offered a wide variety of technical
features. Visible profiles that display an articulated list of friends who are
also users of the system are the backbone of social networking sites. SNS are popular for
a variety of reasons, such as to stay in touch with friends, make plans with
friends, make new friends, or flirt with someone (Lenhart and Madden, 2007).
Other reasons may include feelings of affiliation and belonging, need for
information, goal achievement, self-identity, values, and notions of accepted
behavior (Ridings and Gefen, 2004). Just after joining a social network site,
users are prompted to identify other people in the system who are known to them
in any way. On such sites, popular terms include Friends, Contacts and Fans.
Most Social Network Sites require bi-directional confirmation for Friendship,
but some do not. These one-directional ties are sometimes labeled as Fans or
Followers, but many sites call these Friends as well. The term Friends can be misleading,
because the connection does not exactly mean friendship in the everyday
vernacular sense, and the reasons people connect are varied (Boyd, 2006).
SNS appear in many forms including blogs and micro-blogs,
forums, message boards, social networks, wikis, virtual worlds, social
bookmarking, tagging, writing communities, digital story telling, scrapbooking,
content, image and video sharing, and collective intelligence.
2.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Uses of SNSs among
students in universities and colleges have been a topic of great discussion
among researchers throughout the world. Numerous studies have been conducted to
see what positive and negative impacts these sites have on users. The 2001
report from the Pew Internet and American Life Project (Lenhart, Rainey, and Lewis, 2001) was an early indication of the
increasingly social role that communications technologies would play in the
lives of young people. It found that more than 75 % of teens were using the
Internet, 76% of online teens said they would miss the Internet if they could
no longer go online and 48% said that use of Internet improves their
relationship with friends. When the Pew Internet and American Life Project
updated the results in 2007 (Lenhart, Madden,
Smith, and Macgill, 2007), it was found that the nearly 93% of teens use
the Internet, and most of them treating it as a venue for social interaction.
Karlin (2007)
reported that almost 60% of students who use social networking talk about
education online. Subrahmanyam et al. (2008)
reported that the majority of participants in their sample reported were having
a profile on a SNS. SNS provide a
platform for individuals to express their feelings and opinions. Klein (2008) reported that SNS have
improved communication between students and faculty member. Educational
institute now have an effective vehicle for delivering news, updates, forms,
and files to the staff and students. SNS uses are also beginning to emerge in
college classrooms. Mazer, Murphy, and
Simonds (2007) found that SNS is increasingly being used not only by
students but also by faculty members. According to facebook data, more than 297,000
Facebook members identify themselves as faculty members. Many organizations are
using SNS as tool that allows them to recruit new employees and attract
potential applicants. Mahajan (2009)
said that social networking focuses on building online communities of people
who share interests and/or activities with others, SNSs appear to be in the
process of entering to other areas of teen life, including education.
There are also studies dealing with how privacy issues have
changed over time and that many users now-a-days restrict access to their
profile. The National School Boards
Associations (2007) found that safety policies remain important for SNS
users. Utz and Kramer (2009) found that
the majority of users changed the default privacy settings to more restrictive
settings. Young and Quan-Haase (2009)
also reported that people use other privacy protection strategies.
3.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The core objective of the
present study is to examine the use of Social Networking Sites (SNS) by the students
of Panjab University. The study aims to fulfill some additional objectives
which are as follows:
ü To
study SNS’s usage habits of students
ü To
find out of specific purpose(s) of using SNS
ü To
understand the significance of SNS in academic/research
ü To
find out most preferred SNS
ü To
find out risks and problem faced due to SNS
ü To
check relationship between risks faced and usage of SNS
ü To
check relationship between usage and information sharing
4.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Following methodology has
been used to fulfill the objectives of the present study:
4.1
Scope of the Study
The scope of the study is
limited to 334 students of Panjab University. In this study, an attempt has
been made to study the extent of usage of social networking sites by the
students of different departments of university.
4.2
Sample Selection
Random sampling method
was used for the present study. A total of 500 questionnaires were distributed
among the students and research scholars of Panjab University. Out of 500, only
334 questionnaires were filled completely. Size of the sample is now 334 which
constitute students from all the departments of Panjab University.
4.3
Data Collection for the Study
The data for the study
has been collected through primary as well as secondary sources. The primary
data has been gathered in the form of online and offline questionnaire. Various
on-campus students were invited to take part in survey by stationing personnel
in the university’s various departments and hostels. The secondary data has
been collected from published and non-published sources.
4.4
Tools for analysis
Due to nominal nature of
data from questionnaire, data has been presented in the forms of charts. SPSS
16.0 is used to analyze and interpret the collected data. Frequency, crosstabs
and percentage methods were used during analysis along with t-test, correlation
and regression analysis.
5.
FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
Findings
of the present study have been divided into the following sections:
5.1 SNS
usage habits of students
5.2 Purpose
of using SNS
5.3 Significance
of SNS in academics/research
5.4 Preference
of SNS
5.5 Risks
and problem faced due to SNS
5.6 Relationship
between risks faced and usage/knowledge of SNS
5.7 Relationship
between usage and information sharing
The responses received
from students are illustrated in the form of figures as discussed below:
5.1 SNS usage habits of
students
SNS usage habits of
students of Panjab University can be seen in figure- 5.1. It is very clear from
the figure below that most of the students use social networking sites more
than once in a day. Total 284 out of 334 students use such sites daily, 190
(56.88%) students use these sites more than once a day and 94 (28.14%) students
use these once a day. Further, there are 30 (8.98%) students who visit SNSs
once in a week, 12 (3.59%) students visit such sites once in a month while only
8 (2.39%) students stated that they never visited social networking sites.
Students who never visited SNSs have been excluded further analysis.
Figure-
5.1: SNS usage habits
Source:
Researcher’s Compilation
5.2
Purpose of using SNS
Figure-
5.2 shows that most of the students use SNSs for either finding an old or a new
friends or to socialize with them. Some students are using SNSs for studies
(11.96%) and information sharing (26.38%). Very few students have used such
sites for uploading photos (4.60%) and searching jobs (4.60%). In all more than
half of the students use SNSs for socializing, not for the studies.
Figure-
5.2: Purpose of using SNS
Source:
Researcher’s Compilation
5.3
Significance of SNS in academics/research
It can be clearly seen
from the figure- 5.3 that 265 out of total 326 students use such sites for
other than academic purposes. Only 39 (11.96%) students utilize SNSs for
finding study material, 15 (4.60%) students use them for preparing for jobs and
7 (2.14%) students use SNSs for searching researchers.
Figure-
5.3: Significance of SNS in academics/research
Source:
Researcher’s Compilation
5.4
Preferences of SNS
Figure- 5.4 states it
very clearly that most of the students have preferred Facebook (47.85%),
followed by Twitter (33.74%). Very few students are using Orkut (2.45%), Yahoo
Buzz (2.76%), and Linkedin (3.98%). Students are shifting to Whats Up (26.68%)
from Twitter and Facebook. Students revealed that they were facing privacy
problems from family and relatives on Twitter and facebook so they have shifted
to Whatsup.
Figure- 5.4: Preferences
of SNS
Source:
Researcher’s Compilation
5.5
Risks and problems faced due to SNS
According to figure- 5.5, inappropriate
contents has topped the list as 124 (38.03%) students are stating the problem
of inappropriate contents followed by data security issue, stated by 74
(22.69%) students. 36 (11.04%) students stated Virus or Spyware as risk, 40
(12.26%) students stated privacy issue on stake and 52 (15.95%) students are
afraid of hacking threats. 30% students stated that no risk/problem has been faced
by them due to the usage of SNS.
Figure- 5.5: Risks and
problems faced due to SNS
Source: Researcher’s Compilation
5.6
Relationship between risks faced and usage/knowledge of SNS
To find out the
relationship between the risk faced by the students while using SNS and usage
of SNS, correlation analysis has been used. Table 1 clearly shows that risk
faced by using SNS and the knowledge of SNS are highly negatively correlated
which states that the less you use these sites, the more your risk increases
and vice-versa.
Table
1: Correlation among risk faced and knowledge of SNS
|
Correlation Coefficient
|
Sig (p-value)
|
Pearson Correlation
|
-0.699
|
0.000
|
Spearman Rho
|
-0.726
|
0.000
|
5.7
Relationship between usage and information sharing
Table 2 shows the result
of regression analysis to check the relationship between usage of SNS and
information sharing on such sites. It clearly shows that there is a positive
and significant relationship between the usage of SNS and information sharing i.e.,
students using more SNS shares more information than others.
Table
2: Results of Regression- Relationship between Usage and Information sharing
Model
|
Unstandardized
Coefficients
|
Standardized
Coefficients
|
t
|
Sig.
|
|
B
|
Std.
Error
|
Beta
|
|||
Constant
|
2.249
|
1.294
|
|
1.737
|
.013
|
Usage
|
0.321
|
.195
|
-1.313
|
-.621
|
.002
|
Note: Dependent Variable is Information
Sharing
6.
CONCLUSION
The
following conclusions can be drawn from the research findings:
1) Majority of respondents are aware of SNS. More than half
of the respondents use SNS more than once a day.
2) Most of the user spends time Socialize with friends
followed by updating information.
3) Facebook and Twitter are most preferred SNS among
respondents.
4) Although there are many resources and services
provided by SNS but still risk of data security and inappropriate content is
present in the mind of respondents.
7.
LIMITATIONS
AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
Despite its valuable findings and implications, this
study contains some limitations as discussed below:
1) Due
to time constraints, the research could not be made extensively. The study is limited
to the students of Panjab University only. Study could have been expanded to
include students of other universities as well. Therefore, researchers should be
cautious while generalizing the findings of SNS to the students of other
universities.
2) A
more typical diary research approach may have provided a broader measure about
SNS. Such a method is not used in study because it was difficult to approach
students asking minute-by-minute measure about the use of SNS.
Future studies can be
conducted taking larger sample size. Also, a study can be conducted by
involving more than one university campus for cross-cultural and
cross-marketplace comparison.
REFERENCES
Boyd, D. (2006). Friends,
Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(2). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/ as on Dec, 12 2013.
Boyd, D. M., and Ellison,
N. B. (2008). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal
of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.
Correa, T., Hinsley, A.
W., and Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the web? The intersection of users’ personality and
social media use. Computers in Human
Behavior, 26, 247-253.
Karlin, S. (2007).
Examining how youths interact online. School
Board News, 73(4), 6-9.
Klein, J. (2008). Social
networking for the K-12 set. Learning and
Leading with Technology, 12(5),
1-5.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M.,
Smith, A., and Macgill, A. (2007). Teens and social media. Pew internet and American life project Retrieved
from http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2007/Teens-and-Social-Media.aspx?r=1
as on Dec 16, 2013.
Lenhart, A., Rainey, L., and
Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant message generation and the internet's impact
on friendships and family relationships. Retrieved
from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2001/PIP_Teens_Report.pdf.pdf
on Jan 2, 2014
Lenhart, A., Rainey, L., and
Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant message generation and the internet's impact
on friendships and family relationships. Pew internet
and American life project Retrieved from.
http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Report.pdf
[On-line]. Archived at: http://www.webcitation.org/5I8mIrL6f
as on Jan 2, 2014.
Mahajan, P. (2009). Use
of social networking in a linguistically and culturally rich India. The International
Information and Library Review, 41(3), 129-136.
Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R.
E., and Simonds, C. S. (2007). I'll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure
on student motivation, affective learning, and
classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1-17.
National School Boards Association (2007). Creating and
connecting: Research and guidelines on
online social- and educational-networking. Alexandria, VA: Vockley Lang.
Penzhorn, C. (2009).
Quality through improved service: the implementation of social networking tools in an academic library. In The
proceedings of 30th International Association of Technological University Libraries (IATUL) conference, Katholieke
Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Retrieved from http:// www.iatul.org/doclibrary/public/Conf_Proceedings/2009/Penzhorn-text.pdf
Ridings, C., and Gefen,
D. (2004). Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online. Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication, 10 (1), 1-30.
Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U.
G., and Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family
Foundation. Retrieved from http://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/generation-m-media-in-the- lives-of-8-18-year-olds-report.pdf as on
Jan 2, 2014.
Schwarz, J. (2008),
“Social networking sites help companies boost productivity”, USA Today, July 10, 2008.
Subrahmanyam, K., Reich,
S. M., Waechter, N., and Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: use of social networking
sites by emerging adults. Journal of
Applied Developmental Psychology,
29(6), 420-433.
Tapscott, D. (2008).
Grown up digital: How the next generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Utz, S., and Kra¨mer, N.
(2009). The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: the role of individual characteristics and group norms.
Cyber psychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace,
3(2), Retrieved from http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclankuZ2009111001&articleZ2.
As on Dec 16, 2013.